Some of the takes in this thread are surprising and disappointing.
The decision for Sony is one that I find very compelling, in large part because of the Open Devices program. At one point in time, a company such as HTC offered a relatively easy bootloader-unlocking solution (until their mobile division started to falter). Sony Mobile makes bootloader-unlocking easy, and also offers prebuilt ROMs of Android Open Source Project (a theoretically non-Googled Android build). Meanwhile, Samsung invests millions into their KNOX security, and disables features, or hardware outright when you unlock their bootloader (say goodbye to your camera).
Currently out of the popular manufacturers of smartphones, Sony has my support. Having used both my XA2 on Android briefly, and being stuck with Android on the 10iii until 4.4 or 5 releases, I believe Sony strikes a very good medium of software customization. It isnāt a bloated experience like a Samsung or LG device, it has just a few of Sonyās trimmings to make it distinctly a Sony product, they have a handful of useful features and apps that, while proprietary, are much better apps than the competing versions. I would be very comfortable with Sonyās array of media applications over what Iāve stumbled through using on any other gadget.
Sonyās hardware is absolutely no slouch either. The 10iii has an AMOLED display, the 21:9 aspect ratio, while understandably a tall device, is much slimmer in the hand than you realize. Itās actually slimmer in the horizontal compared to the XA2, which may be the last official option for a small Sailfish device. Yes, itās tall, but itās still practical as a one-handed device, especially since Sailfish is a more gesture-driven OS overall. Front-facing speakers, headphone jack, a 4500mAh battery with fast charging support. NFC is one thing Sony heavily advocates for that I appreciate. They have it on a lot of their products, and they make it very clear where it is on your phone. I have to guess half the time where the NFC reader is on someoneās phone, and the way people fumble with using Google Pay at checkouts, a lot of manufacturers should be taking notes. (EDIT: Turns out there isnāt wireless charging on the 10 iii, and the two-stage shutter button was dropped in favor ofā¦ a Google Assistant button. Thatās a massive bummer, but Iām sure we can make better use of that button in Sailfish.)
Only Googleās Pixel devices can compete in actual price to hardware, and with that, youāre clearly paying that low cost for the privilege of Googleās aggressive data collection and utility for always-listening Assistant (their sales pitch with that is you can check your phone in a store or coffee shop and Assistant will have already listened in and identified what song is playing on the intercom) and their AI-based image processing, which has obviously been gathered from the terabytes of pictures backed up to Google Photos since the first Pixel and beyond. In other regions, Iām sure a Xiaomi or ASUS ROG or Redmagic can provide good hardware ans performance, but thereāll be a lot of bloat in their implementations of Android, even if they lack Google Play services. You get what you pay for. And sorry to say, OnePlus has not been worth their asking prices for the past 5 years. Donāt be duped.
Huawei making an āOpen Devicesā program is hunorous, considering theyāre on the same track that Samsung is going through, with their China-backdoored HarmonyOS in smart TVs, fridges and watches. Thatās as humorous as the notions our own Sailfish would get an Aurora-style fork in those territories.
The Pinephones are not yet daily driver material, thatās without even the stable base of a strong community port of Sailfish. That said, you wonāt probably find as free and open a smartphone for ~$200 like a Pinephone. And to support the Librem, youāll be paying well over the reasonable asking price and mostly, itās for those hardware toggles and the freely available code of the Freescale CPU among other parts, and PureOS is still under heavy development. A great base, but at ~$700, no thanks.
As has already been pointed out, the Open Devices program, and the availability of these binary blobs, are dependent on the manufacturer and companies involved. Those sorts of things are NOT available simply by asking. Sony has to put just as much an effort as Jolla does with convincing a company to make such a thing accessible, and then itās on Sony to get the legalese handled for the little guys to have these small comforts. Sony is a huge minority among the smartphone manufacturers. The only company in this same league is Fairphone, and far as we can tell, any discussions about SFX on Fairphone stop at the community forums. Obviously itās hush-hush stuff that has to be worked out behind closed doors, and Jolla is primarily B2B now.
Elaborating on what David meant by Jollaās market, Sailfish X is the enthusiast and community-focused branch of Sailfish OS. Jolla has put their focus on B2B relations, with Russiaās Rostelecom being one of their strongest contracts, and a large reason for why Aurora OS exists. SFX exists so that the original crowdfunders and the interested parties therein, who still believe in what Jollaās trying to do, have a device and a place that they can belong. If you buy a license, youāre mostly paying for the cost of their Android app support. True, it is not a requirement by any means. Using the free version, or a port, just means you donāt get predictive text, Android apps, Microsoft Exchange, or āOTAā updates. It sounds like that isnāt a deal breaker for you anyway, so fair enough.
As it is, your only bet is any and all community ports. We arenāt aware of any other major devices coming down the pipe, and a lot of us are perfectly happy with our Sony devices. I wouldnāt even be buying another phone in the first place, but my XA2 looks like itās been through some scuffles. Dented top and bottom brackets, missing paint, thereās a chip off in the back plate, and I can tell itās starting to bulge from the battery. Still, it feels good in the hand, screen is always nice to use, still gets respectable standby and SOT, and while I have complaints with memory management that I can only truly solve by justā¦ having more memory (thank goodness the 10iii has 6GB), I will still say Sonyās phone are a solid choice, and Iād recommend them to more people in general if Sony would actually sell their mid-rangers state-side.