Thanks for your clarification. Now, I fully got the meaning of the reply that @tuplasuhveli wrote and the counter question of @miau.
Therefore, I need to reformulate my initial question.
Why StoreMan, Chum and PatchManager are not listed in Jolla Market, at least after having bought the full license?
The same question should be extended to Micro-G suite.
I found the manual for installing Micro-G and sincerly, it is a bit long for something which is quite a basic requirement for almost the people want to use a licensed Android compatible smartphone.
A view above tehcnical stuff
It is ok that Sailfish OS would be a smartphone for hackers, but there is no reason that it would limited to hackers only, as long as Jolla prefers to sell devices instead of licenses.
The unit operative margin for every device can be higher than the unit operative margin for every license (I do not know) but the licensing market it easier and faster to expand and thus can be much more renumerative.
-
Why we should care about Jolla earnings? The day Jolla will go out of the market, our hacking here will probably reach a sad end.
-
Why we should care about Sailfish OS smooth adoption curve? Larger is the user base, more probably some people here got recruited for supporting that large user base.
Even, if you do not care about these two points, there is no reason to waste hackers time in something should be smoothly addressed by a decision. In fact, the day you would reinstall the SFOS on your own smartphone, the same tricky adventure will be repeated, necessarly.