you miss my point:
i do not object to someone pointing out that there is a grokopedia article on SFOS, and that it seems to be reasonably accurate.
i do object to the ceaseless whining about even referencing such a ‘hideous excretion’ on the basis that the owner’s is a baddy-man and his politics are “wrong”.
By definition, when a media/book/encyclopedia is left or right biased tends to loose a certain neutrality, since certain points of view may (and will) become influenced by the very bias.
An example for left/right bias can be easily seen in e.g. migration debates, pregnancy interruption, economic politics, historical events analysis and so on. Maintaining a neutrality there is very difficult, if not impossible, when there is a bias.
At the same time, people who are (very) left- or right-leaning are likely to consider the centre to not be the center, but rather the opposite direction of themselves.
That is, an extreme rightie will likely consider themselves to only be slightly right-leaning and consider something fairly centric to be very lefty (and the other way around).