But if you post in a thread strictly related to the 10 III then the information you post should apply to the 10 III, or else it can only confuse others. It is not a thread about governors or CPU cores in general, but a 10 III specific one, so the information should be valid for the 10 III.
I did not question that it is possible (or maybe even useful) to use two different governors for the big and little cores (in fact, that’s how the 10 III used to be configured by default in previous OS releases, with schedutil for the little cores and performance governor for the big ones), but only that your information was not applicable to the 10 III and thus potentially misleading to others.
Anyway, now that Jolla switched to using schedutil for 10 III’s all 8 cores, and that several people tested using lower minimum frequencies (e.g. 300 MHz) for all cores and also other governors (e.g. ondemand), none of which gave any noticeable power drain reduction, neither during use nor in standby, we already came to the conclusion that it is all in vain because the actual reason of 10 III’s high power drain lays elsewhere, most probably in the AOSP layer.