Two failed services every time on Xperia 10

Does anyone else notice this?
I see this every time I check my Xperia 10. It’s going on for several releases in fact. No clue what is affected.

Before posting as a bug I would like some feedback please.
This testing was done thruee ssh.

[defaultuser@Xperia10 ~]$ systemctl --failed
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION
● dev-mtp.mount loaded failed failed FFS mount
● lxc@multi-user.service loaded failed failed LXC Container: multi-user
`LOAD = Reflects whether the unit definition was properly loaded.` `ACTIVE = The high-level unit activation state, i.e. generalization of SUB.` `SUB = The low-level unit activation state, values depend on unit type.`
2 loaded units listed. Pass --all to see loaded but inactive units, too.
To show all installed unit files use 'systemctl list-unit-files'.

Details about dev-mtp.mount:
[defaultuser@Xperia10 ~]$ systemctl status dev-mtp.mount
● dev-mtp.mount - FFS mount
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dev-mtp.mount; static; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Fri 2021-12-31 10:02:58 CET; 1 weeks 2 days ago
Where: /dev/mtp
What: mtp
Docs: man:hier(7)
Process: 2016 ExecMount=/bin/mount mtp /dev/mtp -t functionfs -o mode=0770,gid=1024(code=exited, status=32)`

After restart [root@Xperia10 defaultuser]# systemctl restart dev-mtp.mount is seems good:
[root@Xperia10 defaultuser]# systemctl status dev-mtp.mount
● dev-mtp.mount - FFS mount
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/dev-mtp.mount; static; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (mounted) since Mon 2022-01-10 00:03:29 CET; 2min 10s ago
Where: /dev/mtp
What: mtp
Docs: man:hier(7)
Process: 3148 ExecMount=/bin/mount mtp /dev/mtp -t functionfs -o mode=0770,gid=1024 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Memory: 36.0K
CGroup: /system.slice/dev-mtp.mount
``
Warning: Journal has been rotated since unit was started. Log output is incomplete or unavailable.

Details about lxc@multi-user.service:
[defaultuser@Xperia10 ~]$ systemctl status lxc@multi-user.service
● lxc@multi-user.service - LXC Container: multi-user
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc@.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Fri 2021-12-31 10:03:16 CET; 1 weeks 2 days ago
Docs: man:lxc-start
man:lxc
Process: 5422 ExecStart=/usr/bin/lxc-start -F -n multi-user (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Main PID: 5422 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

After restart [root@Xperia10 defaultuser]# systemctl restart lxc@multi-user.service it seems the same:
[root@Xperia10 defaultuser]# systemctl status lxc@multi-user.service
● lxc@multi-user.service - LXC Container: multi-user
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc@.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2022-01-10 00:04:48 CET; 10s ago
Docs: man:lxc-start
man:lxc
Process: 4979 ExecStart=/usr/bin/lxc-start -F -n multi-user (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
Main PID: 4979 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
``
jan 10 00:04:48 Xperia10 systemd[1]: Started LXC Container: multi-user.
jan 10 00:04:48 Xperia10 lxc-start[4979]: No container config specified
jan 10 00:04:48 Xperia10 systemd[1]: lxc@multi-user.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
jan 10 00:04:48 Xperia10 systemd[1]: lxc@multi-user.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.

1 Like

Due to changes in mtp service activation this unit file is no longer needed → having it fail is just a cosmetic issue. [I filed an internal ticket about removing it.]

2 Likes

Great. Thanks.

Any comment on lxc@multi-user.service?

IDK for real, but … Service file /usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc@.service comes from lxc-libs.rpm, which is pulled in by lxc.rpm, which is pulled in by aliendalvik rpms. An attempt to activate the service is triggered due to /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/lxc@.service symlink dependency, which points to dynamic enabling on install / stte, which AFAIK is not how these things should be handled in sfos → the service is activated by default, but is not really needed and this is just some sort of packaging hiccup? [I’ll create a ticket about this too]

1 Like