I am not against using AI, and I know for sure that Claude and other solutions are fantastic products, but I chose SailfishOS for security, privacy and open source developed applications. I want applications to be developed by people that I perhaps one day meet and talk with, drink a coffee with or meet at a community meeting or open source conference, and discuss possible new features.
First, we should define what exactly is a AI created apps? You mean vibe coding? What a code partially generated with an AI, but reviewed by a developer? What about an app which is totally open-source?
Many question we have to answer first before we do something
Problem is that one person more or less publish 1 or 2 apps a day over at OpenRepos. I would like to see the «few trees in the massive forrest he is creating». And that potential devs donât just assume that their app idea isâ takenââŠ
I see no problem here. Itâs mentioned in the description that the app has been developed with an AI and youâre on OpenRepos. Itâs the user duty to check what he installs.
Yes, maybe not entirely ban them but making it easier for users to hide them would be nice.
Many people simply donât want to waste their time reading all the descriptions only to find out itâs an AI app at the end.
I also find it REALLY irritating that someone is spamming Openrepos with Claude experiments. I have nothing against ai, per se, but this level of production indicates spam. I now have a NO aviarus apps filter. Not pleasant.
If you can get Basil to add an âAI Appâ category to OpenRepos it will be possible to filter that out in Storeman.
Iff the author publisher chooses to categorize as such that is.
I think some apps have real potential (e.g., WhatsApp), but the developer doesnât maintain the AI ââapps. With so many of apps, itâs no wonder⊠And this is the main problem.
Adding Claude or AI was used to the app description seems like a good thing to me. Isnât that what this whole topic is about? Calling them ads seems like an overreacting to me.
WhatsApp atleast had sources. Most of the apps seem to be using third party libraries with python wrapper on top of it and some qml.
There are no links to repos. So I cannot inspect the code. I will certainly not INSTALL It just to see. Nor will I download the rpms, unpack them JUST TO SEE. Itâs irresponsible and dangerous. People who donât know better, which accounts for a large part of the population say âYeahâ a solution and install it and our collective resource, openrepos, is the origin for some kind of hack!?!
No way, this should be a hard ban. Personally, I wouldnât permit anything on openrepos without links to the repos so that audits are possible.