Well, @Furchur84, here we definitely leave this topic and enter a rather philosophical discussion how logic and proper debates should work; hence only briefly:
O.K., but how useful is a statement / assertion for which that is true?
IMO not at all, because it then is too ambiguous to deduct anything reasonable from it (i.e. here: which Stores to use).
A “I do not want to answer that because it simplifies thing way too much but if you force me to, […]" […]
Nobody must answer senseless questions by addressing their “content”. IMO one should always address them on the meta-level as many did and do:
- Wolfram Alpha: «I believe this can be translated as "INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER»
As an excellent reply to a really cool, nonsensical question! - Isaac Asimov: «Five words were printed: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.»
The absolutely astonishing thing is, that Wolfram Alpha’s (i.e. a machine’s) answer seems to be a witty word-play referring to this excellent short story by Asimov, which is mind-boggling in the light of the story’s content. - Star Treck
- Spock: «No analysis due to insufficient information.»
- The board computer on the Enterprise regularly provides similar replies; IIRC in both, the original series and TNG.
So, when confronted with such superior wisdom, are you now convinced? 
You sure are free to choose what you think, say and communicate to others. But the latter two actions expose your statements to criticism.