[C2] Bugger identifies Jolla C2 as Reeder S19

Bug Reports
,
#1

REPRODUCIBILITY: 100% (always)
OSVERSION: 5.0.0.21
HARDWARE: Reeder S19 Max Pro S - s19mps - s19mps - 1.0.0.15 - aarch64
UI LANGUAGE: Svenska (user: sv_SE, os: sv_SE.utf8)
REGRESSION: no

DESCRIPTION:

This is of course correct in one sense, but could hurt bug report discoverability

PRECONDITIONS:

STEPS TO REPRODUCE:

  1. Sideload Bugger on Jolla C2
  2. Make a bug report

EXPECTED RESULTS:

ACTUAL RESULTS:

MODIFICATIONS:

  • Patchmanager: no
  • OpenRepos: no
  • Chum: yes
  • Other: none specified

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

Device Owner User: defaultuser
Home Encryption: enabled

Edited to add tags

the initial version of this bug report was created using Bugger 0.9.10+git6
3 Likes
#3

Thank you, @coldways !
Your comment has no connection to the bug reported here. Please move it to an apropriate thread.

1 Like
#4

Hi, thanks for this, and thanks for using Bugger!!

Bugger! does not do any identification by itself, it just uses what the phone/OS itself reports.

In this case I think it’s whatever ssu s reports.

So it’s the device adaptation(?) that needs to be updated here.

(But it’s a nice confirmation which exact device the C2 is based on :wink: )

4 Likes
#5

IMG_20241027_151828461_HDR
IMG_20241027_151828461_HDR1920Ă—2550 281 KB

This is the origin device saver of C2. :wink:

4 Likes
#6

The Android App Support identifies itself as Reeder S19, too.

#7

Jolla C2 is actually Reeder S19m Pro S. Its the same device. Difference is only in colour and some markings. So its absolutely ok. Jolla C was Intex Aqua Fish with another LTE Modem Firmware, Jolla Tablet was Aigo X86 with bigger eMMC and better display.
The one and only phone entirely created for Jolla by an OEM was Jolla Phone (Jolla 1) which was never sold as another phone in the Market.

3 Likes
#8

And I just realized this has been changed(?) in 5.0.0.43:

nemo@PGJollaC2:~ $ ssu s
WARNING: ssu.ini does not seem to be writable. Setting
values might not work.
Device registration status: registered
Device model: Jolla C2 (s19mps / c2)
Device UID: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Release: 5.0.0.43
Domain: cbeta
Brand: Jolla
nemo@PGJollaC2:~ $

But Bugger! doesn’t pick this up because it reads /etc/hw-release. I look into it.

2 Likes
#9

Should be fixed in the next (Bugger!) release.

See Issue #41, 7e5c23f7, and 83c65796.

Screenshot_20250118_123929

6 Likes
#10

I’d say that’s factually correct, though perhaps not really relevant. The reason, in my opinion, is that the hardware ID is there to make reports findable. Having some bug reports or answers the refer to the C2 and others to the Reeder S19 only brings drawbacks. Since we normally call it C2 here, we stick to that name.

(Of course, if someone asks “Which device on the market is the C2 actually based on?” then we do need to refer to the Reeder S19.)

2 Likes