When the first Jolla 1 came out, the device was working great from day 1 in terms of basic functionality for a smartphone:
- calling/sound/voice
- SMS
- E-mail (synchronization)
- Calendar (caldav sync)
- Addressbook (cardav sync)
Jolla kept the quality level high for each new Sailfish release, including the migration from Sailfish OS 3 to 4. Also first releases of new hardware adaptations such as Sony Xperia XA2 enjoyed high quality from the beginning.
This has changed with the Sony Xperia 10 III in my experience. Basic functionality doesn’t work reliably (calling, sync, email, etc). Even freezing of the device and random resets.
It means that Jolla is a company with very competent engineers who are able to reach high quality levels. Not a small achievement.
Here comes my advice to the company I like very much (Jolla):
- Investigate by a questionnaire (online form, kyselylomake) how many users of the “legacy” devices are willing to pay to get the basic functionality restored (as mentioned above, there is also a lot of noise on this in the forum).
- Focus on the devices which are most used and offer a one-time paid fix
- Be transparent on what you deliver, and what not (which devices will not be “fixed”)
- Re-gain customer trust in your largest installed base at this moment (the “legacy” devices) before it’s too late
The subscription-model and new devices come after that. It is not clear to me if these devices (including the Jolla C2) have basic functionality working from day 1 as was the case in the past. It is also not clear what 4.6 will bring in terms of stability. Users will be hesitant to take this step (upgrade their device), until it’s clear what will be the quality level.
Please let me know if you need more details and if something is not clear.
Many thanks, Bart