Doesn’t the Jolla C2 use Android 13 (API 33) and it doesn’t seem to be negatively affecting anything? Aren’t Android 11 or 12 blobs still the recommended ones for the 10 III, and Jolla doesn’t seem to wish to do much about it, even though Android 13 (and even 14) blobs have been available from Sony for the 10 III for a long time? Clearly, none of those devices actually really need Android 14.
If so, then how come that SOLELY for the 10 IV and V Android 14 blobs (rather than readily available Android 13 blobs) were so important, that they were chosen even though it was well known that Android 14 blobs from Sony had been broken in many ways (battery level reading, power consumption issues, camera, etc.) and it might take ages (if ever) to have them fixed, whereas Android 13 blobs have been much more mature and finished, readily available? What was the real benefit of choosing to use Android 14 rather than Android 13, if even the kernel versions are the same, and A14 isn’t even anymore the latest Android version, as A15 managed to come out in the meantime (and quite likely Sony will focus on releasing and polishing A15 binaries rather than 14)?
Please, tell me that it wasn’t only to have a cheap excuse not to have to do much about the 10 IV and V support in any foreseeable future, just keep blaming Sony for not providing fixed A14 binaries and focus on the C2 and Mind2 instead… Because, sadly, that’s how it’s been looking like since summer 2024.
If it turned out that it was the actual reason then I’d be really… disappointed, to call it in a polite way.