@iolala I see what you mean now. Thanks for the examples.
I guess I tend to view most things from a pros and cons perspective
Pros Current Tabs:
- They look better
- They match the design of other bitwarden apps people are already familiar with
- Theyāre accessible with your right-hand thumb while holding the phone.
Cons Current Tabs:
- They look less āsailfishyā
Gestures could go either way I guess depending on the user. Iām not a big gesture fan personally, I still use the home button on all my android phones. The gestures only seem to work as I expect them to about 90 percent of the time and having the phone not do what I want 10 percent of the time gets frustrating quick vs a button that always works. I also think it might be a bit weird if the pull-down menu also moves the tabs down with it?
Maybe a good compromise would be an option in Settings > Appearance to toggle between the tabs being top or bottom. Let me know if that is something you or others would like.
@Steve_Everett Awesome, thanks for reporting back. Just let me know if you run into any more bugs or are missing a feature you think would be a good addition. The only feature I left out to my knowledge is the ability to delete your account (for obvious reasons, heh)
@CLMA31
No offense taken. Thank you for actually reading my comments and not making me repeat myself. Spot on.
I give you an A+ on reading comprehension - lol.
To others demanding I respond to them:
Guys, itās a free app. If you donāt want to use it, donāt use it.
To the best of my knowledge, this is the only full featured unofficial mobile Bitwarden client on the market and for that to be on a niche OS like sailfish I think is pretty darn cool.
The only other one I know of that comes close is KeyGuard for Android and that started life as closed source too but eventually became open source much later. It isnāt a one-to-one client though and some features are premium and cost money.
Like it or not, AI is the way of the future. If a developer tells you in 2026 that he doesnāt use AI at all and writes all his boilerplate code by hand or that he manually searches through pages and pages of stackoverflow posts to try and find a solution to his problem, he is either lying to you or is going to be left in the dust by people that do.
Here is the creator and head of Claude Code talking about how they donāt have humans doing any manual development at Anthropic. More and more companies are going to be like this.
I also worry that one day my development job will be replaced by AI but I choose to adapt in the best way I know how and not put my head in the sand.
Iād also take the AI outrage more seriously if it wasnāt being selectively applied.
BitSailorās dev came into my plex thread to say some disrespectful and false things and criticized the use of AI.
If you look down further in the thread I all but proved he is using AI and doubly so if you check the latest commits to fix the vulnerability I reported. (Still not totally fixed btw, so beware)
Now, that doesnāt mean the majority isnāt human coded, in fact, I think it is, because AI would never have made the mistake of passing your master password in plaintext on the command line. That was especially ironic considering he suggested AI would be bad for security.
Maybe the people making those kinds of comments can answer a question for me firstā¦Why are you not in the BitSailor thread bugging him about not disclosing his use of AI while at the same time protesting the use of it?
Open source is great, Iām a big fan, but donāt let it lull you into a false sense of security. That app was open source for 4+ years, and nobody noticed it was leaking your master password.
People just think āOh, itās open source so it must be safeā when in reality, github is one of the largest vectors for viruses and malware on the planet.
How do you know the prerequisite node rpm packaged by him is safe, is the source or build pipeline for that available? How do you know a backdoor wasnāt snuck into that?