RFC: Revision of /home encryption on SFOS

[remote]

@rinigus

but should be no harm done either.

It’s excessive.

@rinigus

As for adding real security - i does not make brute force attack significantly harder on that step

It’s not making it any harder at all.

@rinigus

I expect that it stretches user provided password into larger key space in a rather uniform manner

I’m pretty sure any commonly used hash function does that on any input. That’s one of the properties (avalance effect) of hash functions.

PS We shouldn’t fall into this whole security theatre thing (hell, we already have non-existent “encryption” via numeric PIN in current SFOS), where we put some security buzz-words w/o analysis how it can and will be attacked.