It works perfect on my Sony Xperia 10ii aarch64 SFOS 4.3. Thanky very much!
It is, the content of /var/log/zypp/history
on my Xperia X starts with Jolla’s repositories being added (radd
) during its initial boot after flashing SailfishOS 2.2.0 in May 2018.
But, though I was able to install install-history
0.9.7 via SailfishOS:Chum GUI on this Xperia X (currently with SFOS 3.2.1 installed), there is no desktop icon.
Starting it at the command line per install-history
fails with command not found
, while starting per sailfish-qml install-history
creates an all white window and outputs at the command line, Specified desktop file does not exist "/usr/share/applications/install-history.desktop"
.
Side note: Slava Monich’s harbour-lib might ease supporting a wide span of SailfishOS releases.
Thanks for testing!
The app does not have a desktop icon, it adds an entry in the Settings. Please look there.
This was done for one thing to avoid problems with sailjail, which prevents reading that log file, and also because IMHO it fits in he info section of the settings.
I will look at the library, although atm almost all of my apps including this one are QML only without C++ parts.
Ah so it’s a bit cramped on lower res screens (developed on an X10).
I wonder how to solve this, without cutting off text (which hides information) or line-break
ing (which is ugly)
Oh, a case of not fully RTFM on my side. I stopped reading at “sailjail”, because I was not interested in technical details. Thus I suggest to alter the description to:
Shows when packages have been installed or removed.
This app integrates itself into SailfishOS’ Settings app with a new entry there.<br />
This is necessary in order to read the zypper install log, due to SailJail.
Unfortunately, all I see there on my XperiaX@SFOS3.2.1 with install-history
0.9.7 is:
Could not load page
I will look at the library, although atm almost all of my apps including this one are QML only without C++ parts.
Oh, sorry, then only the QML stuff there may be useful for you in general, but most likely not for install-history
.
BTW, IMO it also is interesting to be able to determine when repositories have been added or removed. This information also seems to be recorded in that log file.
JHm, possilby something in QML is too new for 3.2
Can you launch Settings from terminal, open install history and see if there are any complaints on the console?
,---
| Sailfish OS 3.2.1.20 (Nuuksio)
'---
[nemo@sailfish ~]$ jolla-settings
[D] unknown:0 - Using Wayland-EGL
[W] unknown:809 - file:///usr/lib/qt5/qml/Sailfish/Silica/PageStack.qml:809: Error: Error while loading page: file:///usr/share/install-history/qml/pages/MainPage.qml:41 Invalid property assignment: "acceptableInput" is a read-only property
[nemo@sailfish ~]$
… and that error message is correct! Weirdly not fatal on later versions apparently.
Kindly test install-history-0.9.10 which should fix that, and some more about the search
Noted as a possible addition.
Looking through the history file though, recoding radd
events seems fine, but repos get rremove
d a lot without obvious user interaction - not sure why but maybe it’s connected to ssu-disabled repos, or something Storeman or chum-gui do.
So that would clutter the list a lot.
For me its good and if will read all I can make smaller the text settings. I use the biggest because I am old
install-history
0.9.10 is working well on SFOS 3.2.1.
Thank you very much.
No, it is not cramped due to a lower resolution or different aspect ratio (e.g., on an Xperia X: 1920x1080 = 16:9), AFAIU @rdomschk has deliberately set the font size to “largest”.
IMO the layout of the two line entries, each starting with a “+
”- or “-
”-icon and concluding with the app icon (if extant), is really fine by all aspects: text sizes, icon sizes, text colouration etc.
My suggestions, now that I have seen install-history
:
-
The date labels between the entries proper have a strange “flow”, altering at least three times:
Today
,Yesterday
, thenSunday
(today - 3),Saturday
(today - 4),Friday
(today - 5),Wednesday
(today - 6), thenFebruray
(month of (day - 7)),February
,February
,February
, …,January
, …,March
, then2021
,2021
,2021
, …,2020
,2020
, …,2019
,2019
, …,2018
,2018
.
This omits the precise date (> 6 days ago) or does not properly name it (“Which date was last Sunday?”), even though the exact date can be retrieved from each individual entry.Please always provide a full date with a spelled out month, e.g.31 January 2022
, do not omit the day of the month (as always, currently), plus either the year or the month.Please alter the naming scheme at most once (i.e., 0 or 1 time): I.e., either always use the aforementioned full date format (31 January 2022
) or start withToday
andYesterday
, then switch to the aforementioned full date format.
Personally I would prefer the simpler approach of consistently displaying the full date format with a spelled out month.
Edit / change of opinion:
After thinking about this point for a while,I think these separators are just superfluous, because the exact date can always be retrieved from each individual entry. These “date separators” simply consume space unnecessarily without providing any additional information. Side note: This is more prevalent in landscape orientation.
Altered suggestion: Eliminate the “date separators”. -
The search selection field does occupy quite some space (even with the search field proper closed), especially in landscape orientation: Please move its functionality to pulley menu entries.
I.e., if the search field is hidden, display two pulley menu entries “
Search for date
” and “Search for name
” (the latter being the lower one, as currently in the selection menu), and if one of them is active, substitute this one by “Close search field
”. -
WRT “
radd
” and “rremove
” events (adding and removing of repositories)-
that would clutter the list a lot.
Oh, I considered these to be optionally displayed. For example by another pulley menu entry displaying either “
Show repository events
” (when inactive) or “Hide repository events
” (when active).
When active, IMO these repo-related entries should be seamlessly interleaved with the events for adding and removing packages. -
IMO displaying such events needs two additional icons for adding and removing repositories, which are distinctively different (by colour and symbol) from the extant ones for package events.
E.g., a small circle symbol “○
” on a blue background for anradd
event and a medium-sized saltire (diagonal cross, also called Saint Andrew’s Cross) “X
” on a yellow background for anrremove
entry. -
repos get
rremove
'd a lot without obvious user interaction - not sure why but maybe it’s connected to ssu-disabled repos, or something Storeman or chum-gui do.Maybe we can develop a scheme (algorithm) for not displaying irrelevant
rremove
entries later. Being able to easily observe (by the help ofinstall-history
) when they are recorded (e.g., during SailfishOS upgrades etc.) will make it much easier to determine which are irrelevant.
-
-
Old suggestion, but overhauled: Enhance package description
Shows when packages have been installed or removed.
Install-history integrates into the SailfishOS’ Settings application with a new entry in the "Info" section there.
-
Suggestion: Alter the statement
nnn records
(technical term) tonnn entries
(common term). -
Topic: “No line-breaking, because a mix of two and three line entries would be visually disturbing.”
I believe the proper solution for this is to present the full information for an entry in a separate page, which opens when long-pressing an entry.
HTH
What if you only leave the hour in the description of the installed app and add the date and day and year on the right where you now see the day and month between the apps.
Or leave the icons out. There is a search function so no need to see icons.
My 2 cents.
AFAIU this is the regular look, which is fine IMO. Smaller fonts would make it really hard to read.
Note that the second line of an entry never overflows to the right, hence this is a non-issue IMO.
And without a date, the time is hard to comprehend as such: 15:41
could mean anything.
Yes, omitting the application icons would alleviate the issue a tiny bit, but IMO they are a nice visual gimmick. And the icons at the left are essential.
I know and @nephros knows:
But IMO he met the right decision: No line-breaking, because a mix of two and three line entries would be visually disturbing.
The easy workaround for this is to use landscape orientation!
Then only very few entries are too long, still.
I believe the proper solution is to present the full information for an entry in a separate page, which opens on long-pressing an entry.
P.S.: I captured this as point 6 in my list of suggestions.
So, about those repo events:
I after almost finishing the repo event things, I noticed that user-added repos are not recorded in the log, i.e. there are no radd
events for repos that are in the ssu “user” list.
Add to that those spurious rremove
events (which do reference user-added repos it seems*) ), what remains useful to display are the add/remove events for official Jolla/system-wide repos - and those change very little, basically only when upgrading releases.
I have therefore ceased development of that feature as basically WONTFIX/WOULDHAVEABEENNICE. If anyone wants to pick up where I left it, it’s in this branch.
*) I suspect it’s Storeman’s “remove repos with no installed apps” feature which does that, but not at all sure.