The title of the thread “Total Buggy OS” was not mine, nor was the term “Forum Police” - I simply contributed to an existing thread with my point of view on these matters (which was then censored).
You have now contributed your opinion on this matter - and that is your right to do so. Your opinion is obviously personal, genuinely held and therefore reasonable. You have, in my opinion, neither been offensive nor insulting in how you put your point of view forward.
But what if I didn’t like it because it contradicts my own?
What if I decided to hide your post because I wanted to suppress your view on the matter in favour of my own?
I’m not going to tell you my reasoning, I’m not going to let you challenge my justification in suppressing your view - in fact you won’t even know who was responsible for suppressing your point of view.
You might decide to try and post your view again - but that’s fine for me, I’ll just keep hiding it until you give up.
How do you feel about the situation now?
Suppression of free speech, communication or information (even if it is only temporary and can be accessed at a different time or in a different manner) is the very definition of censorship and, in my humble opinion, has no place in a civilized society.
If feedback were provided then I might agree with you, but it wasn’t and it isn’t. See my other post for proposals to make things better Forum Censorship - Some Proposals
I don’t know whether you meant to or not, but you have illustrated the point I was trying to make absolutely perfectly 