CHUM considered harmful

Actually it’s even funnier, chum staff will promote your package if it builds, if it doesn’t build… How would they even try to promote it? The technical check: your package builds is already failing in :testing… Yeah testing<->nontesting split is imaginary, unless they can promote non-building package, but what??? Are people going to dl sources? The whole testing/nontesting split is a theatre
Edit2: yeah the staff check is non-existant, chum:testing is functionallly the same as chum, wonder if @rainemak or @vige could chime in if using forum accounts and maybe their level could somehow be used for chum:prod promotions, using randos from the street won’t really work, tying ‘tested’ upvotes with forum accounts would make sense? But is it legal…