Wireless charging debate

So, some people voiced concerns about the missing features, while others still considered this situation normal.

5–9V, max 1A

It would have been better if there had been no wireless charging at all. We do not use wireless charging just to charge the device while sleeping. When we go to a café or somewhere outside in general, instead of carrying a charger with us, there are now even tables in cafés like Starbucks that have built-in wireless charging. What do you think these are for? Do they put them there for no reason? They are placed there so people can quickly meet their charging needs, and isn’t that the reason why this feature is becoming more common nowadays?

We go somewhere, our battery is low, and there is already wireless charging on the table, so we think, “Let me put it there and let it charge as much as it can.”

5–9V, max 1A

With this specification, it will be very slow, meaning the feature will not actually be useful for us in a real sense.

I also think the E-link screen is a bit behind. Even if we make it a notification screen, constantly updating it will probably put too much strain on it. Some people in the group were discussing whether it could be used as a second screen, but that also seems almost impossible. When we use an E-link screen, I assume we will not get a true 60Hz feeling, but still…

Send the email, take my money, Jolla.